Law

Paugh vs . The City of SeattleIn Paugh vs . The City of Seattle , certain exceptions to the common virtue teaching method of exempting landowners of any liability pertaining capitaliseers were delineated in the case of squirtren trespassers . The tenet came to be called the attractive nuisance principle which aids in meting out judgment in tort cases involving injury of boor trespassers on public or private property . In this case , several sources should be present for a chest to be considered an attractive nuisance and thereby , attaching liability on the part of the owner of the property In tort police of Washington State , liability attaches to a land owner if the injury was the result of an artificial condition upon the land and bottom(prenominal) the following conditions (Paugh vs .

City of Seattle (a ) the place where the condition exists is one upon which the proprietor fill outs or has solid ground to know that children are liable(predicate) to trespass , and (b ) the condition is one of which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will submit an exuberant risk of death or serious material deadening to such children , and (c ) the children because of their youth do not peril the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or in coming within the area do monstrous by it , and (d ) the utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the int erference of eliminating the insecurity are! slight as compared with the risk to...If you desire to produce a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay